Centrelink & Aged Care - Related News
This page contains a list of news articles that you may find relevant to this section of the website.
For the full list of all news articles please click here.

-
I (Scott Keeley) spend much of my day speaking with the families of people who are preparing to enter Aged Care Facilities. This is a particularly traumatic time for most family, and this trauma is only compounded by the complex nature of the various fee structures. In my contact with clients, often the same questions come up. There is the opinion that the cost of Aged Care is far too expensive, and unaffordable for those who own their own home, but have little in the way of other assets.
I thought I'd provide here a list of the most common myths that I hear that relate to the cost of Aged Care.
My ongoing fees will only be 85% of my pension!
While the Basic Daily Care Fee is linked to 85% of the full Age Pension, additional fees can also be charged. These include Daily Income Tested Fees, Accommodation Charges (for high level care) and potential Extra Services Fees. As a result, the total ongoing fee may be a lot higher than 85% of the pension.
I will have to sell my home to pay for the Accommodation Bond!
Maybe, but not necessarily. While this may be the most commonly explored option, renting the home and organising to pay the Accommodation Bond via periodic payments may also achieve an affordable outcome.
Only the rich who can afford to pay a large Accommodation Bond can get into a low level care facility!
The Government does in many cases subsidise the costs associated with providing Aged Care for those residents who are unable to afford large Accommodation Bonds. Furthermore, Aged Care Facilities are required to set aside a certain percentage of beds for "concessional" or "assisted" residents, ensuring everyone has equal access to care.
The Accommodation Bond is dead money!
A large proportion of money paid as an Accommodation Bond is refunded to the resident when they leave the Aged Care Facility, or to their estate when they pass away.
I'd be better off giving everything away so I can avoid or lower the fees!
As with most things in life, money buys choice. Having assets at your disposal should ensure you can choose an Aged Care Facility that is close to family, can provide the required care, and that you are happy with. Giving away assets may not improve your position. It can have significant implications from a Centrelink and an Aged Care Fee perspective. Seek specialist advice before considering this!
If we set up a family trust, we can avoid or lower the fees!
While this may be sometimes true, again specialist advice is required before considering this. The utilisation of family trusts may have some impact in reducing Daily Income Tested Fees, however I'm yet to be convinced of the merit. The Daily Income Tested Fee is only reduced because the resident's income is reduced! Sure, you pay less fees, but only because you receive less income! Robbing Peter to pay Paul?
Summary
Too much emphasiscan beplaced on keeping the full rate of Age Pension, or paying the lowest possible ongoing fees for Aged Care. In my mind, this focus is misplaced. Overall cashflow is far more important (regardless of the source). Let us help you find the best outcome. Crunching the numbers, and being aware of all of your options, should ensure that the financial aspects of entering Aged Care are far less intimidating.
Scott Keeley - enquiries@wakefieldpartners.com.au
(08) 8333 2488
Read full article
-
In September 2007, John Howard’s parting gift was a significant increase to the Asset Test limits for Age Pension. To provide some context, pre-September 2007, if a couple who owned their home had more than $531,000 in other assets (real estate other than the home, financial investments, motor vehicles etc) they would have no entitlement to Age Pension.
As at 20th March 2010, that same couple can have $957,500 in assets other than their home and potentially still be eligible for an Age Pension.
Let me say that again! A couple who own their home can have pretty much $1 million in other assets, and potentially qualify for an Age Pension!
These changes were widely publicised at the time, in fact the Government estimated that an additional 100,000 Australians would become eligible for Age Pension as a result.
While many older Australians applied for, and became, Age Pensioners, I am still surprised to see a few people a month come through our doors that are now eligible that aren’t aware.
So why aremany older Australians who are entitled to Age Pension not receiving their entitlement?
The answer perhaps lies with the date of the change - September 2007. In September 2007, the Australian Sharemarket was setting record highs (the ASX All Ordinaries passed through 6,500 points), and the words “sub” and “prime” were rarely mentioned in the same sentence, let alone joined to make one word! People’s financial assets were perhaps quite substantial and well in excess of even the new significantly improved Asset Test limits.
Almost 3 years later, the Global Financial Crisis now has arecognisable acronym, the ASX All Ordinariessit at 4,400 and some people’s financial assets havereduced in value.
Why not take some time to revisit your situation and explore your entitlements. With over 12 years working at Centrelink, Scott Keeley can review your assets and assist you to determine whether or not you may be eligible for any forms of assistance from Centrelink. And don't be afraid of the paperwork, he can help you with that too.....
Read full article
-
As part of our long standing association with Seniors Information Service, I will be presenting a seminar on 18th May 2010.
Seniors Information Service is located at 76 Waymouth Street, Adelaide. If you are interested, please contact Heather at Seniors Information Service on 8168 8701.
If you are unable to make the session, but would like a copy of the slides, would like to be made aware of upcoming seminars, or would like to have a chat about potential or existing Centrelink entitlements, please Contact Us.
Scott Keeley
Read full article
|
|
|